International Journal of Environmental Protection          
An Open Access Journal
ISSN: 2226-6437(Print)      ISSN: 2224-7777(Online)
Frequency: Annually
Editorial-in-Chief: Prof. Kevin Mickus,
Missouri University of Science & Technology, USA.
Pahicmetria, a Model of Metric in Environmental Hydric Planning
Full Paper(PDF, 441KB)
Abstract:
This paper considers the abstraction of a parametric model of environmental planning in a watershed (expressed in processes, complex patterns, and UML diagrams), as an element for decision-making using tools ORs, which facilitates the model and implements an environmental planning water. This management strategy set during the planning of water resources, represented in ArchiMate, offers a model of integrated metric parameters and elements for proper planning that make up the actors in a watershed.
Keywords:Software Engineering; Environmental Planning; Treatment Plants; Municipal Wastewater; Life Cycle Analysis
Author: Juan Pablo Rodríguez Miranda1, Sandro Javier Bolaños Castro2, César Augusto García Ubaque3
1.Faculty of the Environment and Natural Resources. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
2.Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
3.Faculty of Technology, and Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
References:
  1. R. Argent, «An overview of model integration for environmental applications components, frameworks and semantics,» Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 1, nº 3, pp. 219-234, 2004.
  2. L. Briand, «TRANSACTIONS, 818- 824. 2004.,» The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 4, nº 1, pp. 245-273, 202.
  3. O. David, «A software engineering perspective on environmental modeling framework design: The Object Modeling System,» Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 2, nº 3, pp. 201-213, 2013.
  4. A. Rizzoli, «Chapter Seven Integrated Modelling Frameworks for Environmental Assessment and Decision Support,» de Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessmen, USA, Elsevier, 2008, pp. 85-89.
  5. S. Bolaños, «LMPS como una propuesta alterna a BPMN para el modelado de procesos de software,» Tecnura, vol. 4, nº 1, pp. 157-170, 2012.
  6. O. Pilskalns, «Testing UML designs,» Information and Software Technology , vol. 6, nº 2, pp. 892-912, 2007.
  7. K. Robles, «Towards an ontology-based retrieval of UML Class Diagrams,» Information and Software Technology, vol. 5, nº 2, pp. 72-86, 2012.
  8. B. Willard, «UML for systems engineering,» Computer Standards & Interfaces,, vol. 7, nº 1, pp. 69-81, 2007.
  9. J. Rodríguez, «Contaminación del agua,» de La Contaminación ambiental en Colombia, Bogotá, Fundación Encausa por el desarrollo humano, 2010, pp. 255-300.
  10. R. Argent, «Land and water resources model integration: software engineering and beyond,» Advances in Environmental Research, vol. 6, nº 2, pp. 351-359, 2001.
  11. H. Florez, «Procesos de ingeniería de software,» Revista Vinculos, vol. 5, nº 1, pp. 26-39, 2009.
  12. G. Hanssen, «A longitudinal case study of an emerging software ecosystem: Implications for practice and theory,» The Journal of Systems and Software, pp. 1455 - 1466, 2012.
  13. P. Kroll, Agility and Discipline Made Easy: Practices from OpenUP and RUP, Upper Saddle River, NL: Addison Wesley Pub Co Inc, 2006.
  14. D. Pilone, UML 2.0 in a Nutshell, USA, 2005.
  15. R. Pressman, Ingeniería del software. 7 Edición, Mexico: McGraw Hill, 2010.
  16. L. Tabares, Personalización de RUP para proyectos académicos de desarrollo de software, Medellin, Colombia: EAFIT, 2011.
  17. I. Jacobson, El Proceso Unificado de Desarrollo de Software, USA: Addison Wesley, 2000.
  18. P. Abrahamsson, Agile software development methods review and analysis, VTT Publications, 2002.
  19. A. Kasoju, «Analyzing an automotive testing process with evidence-based software,» Information and Software Technology, pp. 1237-1259, 2013.
  20. I. Sommerville, Ingeniería de Software, Madrid, España: Pearson Education S.A., 2005.
  21. E. Germain, «Engineering-based processes and agile methodologies for software development: a comparative case study,» Journal of Systems and Software,, pp. 17-27, 2005.
  22. S. Bolaños, «Process management software as a script and the as a pattern,» International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, pp. 147 - 150, 2012.
  23. M. Niazi, «Software process improvement barriers: A cross-cultural comparison,» Information and Software technology, pp. 1204 - 1216, 2010.
  24. S. Bolaños, «Software process modeling language spml- as an alternative proposal to bpmn for modeling development processes,» Tecnura, pp. 158 - 171, 2012.
  25. N. Chomsky, Syntactic structures, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Gmbh & Co, 1957.
  26. K. Rosen, Matematica discreta, New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2004.
  27. G. e. a. Benveniste, «Análisis del ciclo de vida y reglas de categoria de producto en la construcción. El caso de las baldosa cerámicas,» Informes de construccion, pp. 71 - 81, 2011.
  28. A. De Carvalho F, Análisis del ciclo de vida de productos derivados del cemento - aportaciones al análisis de los inventarios del ciclo de vida del cemento, Barcelona, españa: Universidad Politecnica de Cataluña, 2001.
  29. J. Leitmann, «Sustaining Cities: Environmental Planning and Management in Urban Design.,» US, 1999.
  30. Zhang Q.H. et al, «Application of life cycle assessment for an evaluation of wastewater treatment and reuse project - case study of Xi An, China,» Bioresource technology, pp. 1421 - 1425, 2010.
  31. Deusto Tech, Metodología para el análisis del ciclo de vida de depuradoras de aguas residuales, Deusto: Universidad de Deusto, 2012.
  32. Rodríguez J.P. et al, «Estudio de comparación del tratamiento de aguas residuales domésticas utilizando lentajas y buchón de agua en humedales artificiales,» Tecnología y ciencias del agua (ingeniería hidráulica en méxico), pp. 59 - 68, 2010.
  33. L. E. García, El Manejo integrado de los recursos hídricos en America latina y el Caribe. No ENV - 125., Washington D.C.: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo BID, 1998.
  34. S. Aronoff, Geographic Information Systems: a management perspective., Ottawa, Canadá: WDL Publications, 1989.
  35. O. Brilhante, Municipal Environmental Planning and Management Training., The Netherlands: IHS, 2003.
  36. S. Sheila, Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance (Politics, Science, and the Environment)., USA, 2004.
  37. A. Castelliti, «Integration, participation and optimal control in water resources planning and management,» Applied Mathematics and Computation , pp. 21 - 33, 2008.
  38. J. Dietrich, «CHAPTER 11. Workflow Oriented Participatory Decision Support for Integrated River Basin Planning,» 2010, pp. 207 - 221.
  39. A. Salah, «Use of goal programming and integer programming for water quality management—A case study of Gaza Strip,» European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 1991 - 1998, 2006.