International Journal of Environmental Protection          
An Open Access Journal
ISSN: 2226-6437(Print)      ISSN: 2224-7777(Online)
Frequency: Annually
Editorial-in-Chief: Prof. Kevin Mickus,
Missouri University of Science & Technology, USA.
Mainstreaming Green Infrastructure Elements into the Design of Public Road Reserves: Challenges for Road Authorities
Full Paper(PDF, 6352KB)
lobal warming poses particular challenges for urban areas due to the greater intensity of rainfall and issues of stormwater runoff, and the heat island effect generated by the reflection of the sun off hard surfaces, such as buildings and road pavements; for example, in Australian cities (i.e., Sydney), roads account for approximately 25% of all urban land use. The challenge for road authorities is to implement green infrastructure in road planning, design and implementation as the term “green infrastructure” has appeared increasingly throughout the world in land management and planning. Despite these environmental challenges, traditional highway engineering practices use arguments regarding the economic inefficiencies of urban traffic congestion to justify the business case for road-widening schemes and new road construction projects with associated de-forestation and vegetation loss. An international literature review and site visits of green infrastructure best practice in Australia, Singapore, the U.K. and the USA is reported. A typical road authority project is described in Sydney, Australia, where the initial design concept to accommodate growth in all modes of transport was road widening and land acquisition, but the authors persuaded the local and state government authorities to consider other options to “green” the infrastructure, particularly opportunities to add trees and vegetation near the roadway, which provide the additional bonus of managing surface water runoff. From this general problem, the case for, and value to, road authorities to develop green infrastructure guidelines for project planning and implementation, are presented. The conclusions include ongoing research to formulate draft guidelines for governments based on a holistic approach to the planning and design of high-density urban development around transport nodes that includes green infrastructure principles.
Keywords:Green Infrastructure; Road Planning and Implementation; Best Practice Guidelines
Author: John Black1, Kam Tara2, Parisa Pakzad3
1.Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies (IES) Network, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
2.Urban Research and Planning (URaP) Pty Ltd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
3.Faculty of the Built Environment, Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
  1. A. B. Jacobs, Great Streets, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
  2. T. D. Youngquist, “What is green infrastructure? An evaluation of green infrastructure plans from across the United States,” Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State Univ., Ames, lowa, 2009.
  3. G. Austin, Green Infrastructure for Landscape Planning: Integrating Human and Natural Systems, New York: Routledge Press, 2014.
  4. M. A. Benedict and E. T. McMahon, Green Infrastructure:Linking Landscapes and Communities, Washington D.C.: Island Press, 2006.
  5. R. MacFarlane, “Multi-functional landscape: conceptual and planning issues for the countryside,” in Landscape and Sustainability, 2nd ed., J. Benson and M. Roe, Eds. New York: Routledge Press, 2007.
  6. I. L. McHarg, Design with Nature, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Natural History Press, 1969.
  7. (2012) National Planning Policy Framework. [Online]. Available:
  8. R. Lafortezza, C. Davies, G. Sanesi, and C. C. Konijnendijk, “Green Infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions,”IFOREST, vol. 6, iss.3, pp. 102-108, 2013.
  9. F. Reinwald, D. Damyanovic, C. Brandenburg, B. Allex, B. Gantner, C. Czachs,andJ. Preiss,“Urban green infrastructure planning as a contribution to the smart green city,” in Proc. REAL CORP, pp. 757-761, 2014.
  10. Asian Development Bank, Green Cities, M. Lindfield and F. Steinberg, Eds., Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, Urban Development Series, Nov. 2012.
  11. (2010) Green Infrastructure in the Merseybelt- Catalysing Growth, Transforming Land and Sustaining Ecosystems. [Online]. Available:
  12. (2011) Building Climate Change Adaptation with Smart Growth and Green Infrastructure: Adaptive Planning Policies from Rotterdam, Lyon, and Barcelona- Policy Brief. [Online]. Available:
  13. (2013) “The rise of the Woonerf” [Online]. Available:
  14. Department of the Environment Sport and Territories Australia, Urban Design:How Climate Information Can Help in Design of More Liveable Neighbourhoods - Energy Conservation; Economic Savings and Reduced Emissions of Greenhouse Gases, Canberra: Bureau of Meteorology,Commonwealth of Australia, Rep. 479066,1997.
  15. C. H. Philipp, J. Wannous, and P. Pakzad, “Thermal impact of blue infrastructure: Casestudy Cheonggyecheon, Seoul (Korea),” in Proc. ICUC9 - 9th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment, paper CCMA5-5-8531677, July 2015.
  16. (2015) The Urban Heat Island Effect and Western Sydney. [Online]. Available:
  17. S. Naumann, M. Davis, T. Kaphengst, M. Pieterse, and M. Rayment, “Design, Implementation and Cost Elements of Green Infrastructure Projects,”Ecologic institute and GHK Consulting, Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Rep. 070307/2010/577182/ETU/F.1, Dec. 2011.
  18. Department of Sustainability and Environment, “Living Melbourne, Living Victoria Roadmap,” Ministerial Advisory Council for the Living Melbourne Living Victoria Plan for Water, Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, March 2011.
  19. T. H. F. Wong, R. Allen, J. Beringer, R. R. Brown, A. Deletić, T. D. Fletcher, L. Gangadharan, W. Gernjak, and et al., Blueprint 2012- Stormwater Management in a Water Sensitive City, Melbourne, Australia: The Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Monash Univ., 2012.
  20. (2014) Water and Wellness: Green Infrastructure for Health Co-Benefits. [Online]. Available:
  21. J. W. Thompson and K. Sorvig, Sustainable Landscape Construction: A Guide to Green Building Outdoors,Washington D.C.: Island Press, 2000.
  22. (2011) Maintaining Pre-Development Hydrology: The Eight Hydrologic Functions of Forests and Trees. [Online]. Available:
  23. City of Melbourne, “Water Sensitive Urban Design Guidelines: Applying the Model WSUD Guidelines,”Melbourne, Australia: City of Melbourne, 2005.
  24. I. H. Thompson and K. Sorvig, Sustainable Landscape Construction: A Guide to Green Building Outdoors, 2nd ed., Washington D.C: Island Press, 2008.
  25. M. Ely and S. Pitman, Green Infrastructure; Life Support for Human Habitats, Adelaide, Australia: Botanic Gardens of Adelaide, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, 2014.
  26. City of Seattle, “Seattle’s Natural Drainage Systems,” Seattle Public Utilities, 2008.
  27. New York City Department of Design and Construction, “High Performance Infrastructure Guidelines: Best Practices for the Public Right-of-Way,” New York City Department of Design and Construction and the Design Trust for Public Space, New York, 2005.
  28. Chicago Department of Transportation, “Sustainable Streets Program, Chicago Department of Transportation, Policies and Guidelines,” Chicago Department of Transportation, 2013.
  29. United States - Environmental Protection Agency, “Conceptual Green Infrastructure Design for the Blake Street Transit-Oriented Development Site, City of Denver,” Urban Land Conservancy Denver, Colorado, Rep. EP-C-11-009, 2013.
  30. City of Emeryville, “Stormwater Guidelines for Green, Dense Redevelopments: Stormwater Quality Solutions for the City of Emeryville,”Emeryville, California: Community Design + Architecture with Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates Philip Williams Associates,2005.
  31. The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), “Asian Green City Index; Assessing the environmental performance of Asia’s major cities,” Siemens AG, Munich, 2011.
  32. (2015) 2015 Quality of Living Rankings [Online]. Available:
  33. The Economist Intelligences Unit (EIU), “The Global Liveability Ranking,” 2014.
  34. P. Newman, “Green urbanism and its application to Singapore: A tale of seven green cities,”CITYGREEN, Resilience in Cities Above and Beyond,iss. 10,pp. 130-135, 2010.
  35. Urban Land Institute, “10 Principles for Liveable High-Density Cities: Lessons form Singapore,” Centre for Liveable Cities and Urban Land Institute, Singapore, 2013.
  36. Singapore Institute of Landscape Architecture, “Streetscape Greenery Master Plan,” 2002.
  37. P. Newman, “Biophilic urbanism: A case study on Singapore,”Australian Planner, vol. 51, iss.1, pp. 47-65, 2014.
  38. N.Park, “Conserving our Biodiversity: Singapore’s National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. Singapore,” National Park Board, 2009.
  39. Singapore Green Plan, “Beyond Clean and Green Towards Environmental Sustainability,”Singapore: Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, 2012.
  40. N. Park, “The Greenery Provision for Roadside,”Singapore: Singapore National Park Board, 2011.
  41. (2010) Building natural value for sustainable economic development: The green infrastructure valuation toolkit user guide. [Online]. Available:
  42. Natural England Commissioned Reports (NECR126), “Green Infrastructure Valuation Tools Assessment,” London: Natural England, 2013.
  43. (2013) State of Australian Cities 2013. [Online]. Available:
  44. H. Taha, D. Sailor, and H. Akbari, “High-albedo materials for reducing cooling energy use,”Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, UC-350, Rep. 31721, 1992.
  45. J. Ahern, “Planning and design for sustainable and resilient cities: Theories, strategies, and best practices for green infrastructure,” in Water Centric Sustainable Communities: Planning, Retrofitting, and Building the Next Urban Environment, V. Novotny, J. Ahern, and P. Brown, Eds., Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 135-176, 2010.
  46. L. McDonald, W. Allen, M. A. Benedict, and K. O'Conner, “Green infrastructure evaluation frameworks,”J. Conserv. Plan.,vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 12-43, 2005.
  47. Australian Institute of Landscape Architect (AILA), “Adapting to Climate Change: Green Infrastructure,” Canberra, 2012.
  48. G. M. Moore, “Treenet: A management system and choices for Australia,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the Inaugural Street Tree Symposium,Adelaide, pp. 8-18, Sep. 2000.
  49. P. Killicoat, E. Puzio, and R. Stringer, “The economic value of trees in urban areas: Estimating the benefits of Adelaide’s street trees,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the 3rd National Street Tree Symposium,p. 12, Sep. 2002.
  50. L. Plant, “Beautiful one day, perfect the next-Is there room for improvement?,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the 7th National Street Tree Symposium, Brisbane, 2006.
  51. J. Tarran, “Trees, urban ecology and community health,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the 7th National Street Tree Symposium, Brisbane, Sep. 2006.
  52. D. Fam, E. Mosley, A. Lopes, L. Mathieson, J. Morison, and G. Connellan, “Irrigation of urban green spaces: A review of environmental, social and economic benefits,” Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures, Rep. 04/08, 2008.
  53. J. Tarran, “People and trees: Providing benefits, overcoming impediments,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the 10th National Street Tree Symposium, Adelaide, Sep. 2009.
  54. M. Townend and R. Weerasuriya, “Beyond Blue to Green: The benefits of contact with nature for mental health and well-being, A Literature Review,” School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University prepared for Beyond Blue: The National Depression Initiative, 2010.
  55. City of Melbourne, “Urban Forest Strategy: Making a great city greener 2012-2032,”Melbourne: City of Melbourne, 2011.
  56. GHD, “Report for Urban Heat Island Effect, Mitigation Strategies and Planning Policy Approaches,”Melbourne: City of Melbourne, 2011.
  57. T. H. F. Wong and R. R. Brown, “The water sensitive city: Principles for practice,”Water Science & Technology -WST, vol. 60, iss.3, pp. 673-682, 2009.
  58. M. A. Adams and P. L. Smith, “A systematic approach to model the influence of the type and density of vegetation cover on urban heat using remote sensing,” Landsc.Urban Plan.,vol. 132, pp. 47-54, 2014.
  59. Nursery and Garden Industry Australia (NGIA), “Estimating the benefits of Australian Street Trees using i-Tree Stratum - A Pilot Study,” Nursery Papers, Nursery and Garden Industry Australia, 2011.
  60. A. Holbrook, “The green we need: An investigation of the benefits of green life and green spaces for urban dwellers’ physical, mental and social health,”Nursery and Garden Industry Australia (NGIA) and Univ. of Newcastle's Digital Repository, NSW, Australia, 2009.
  61. G. M. Moore, “Urban trees and the global greenhouse,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the 7th National Street Tree Symposium, Brisbane, Sep. 2006.
  62. (2009) Urban Forests and Climate Change. [Online]. Available:
  63. B. Thom, J. Cane, R. Cox, C. Farrell, P. Hayes, R. Kay, A. Kearns, and et al., “National Climate Change Adaptation Research Plan: Settlements and Infrastructure,” National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, 2010.
  64. A. M. Coutts, J. Beringer, and N. J. Tapper, “Impact of increasing urban density on local climate: Spatial and temporal variations in the surface energy balance in Melbourne, Australia,”J.Appl. Meteor. Climatol., vol. 46, iss.4, pp. 477-493, 2007.
  65. M. E. Loughnan, N. Nicholls, and N. Tapper, “Demographic, seasonal, and spatial differences in acute myocardial infarction admissions to hospital in Melbourne Australia,”Int. J. Health Geogr., vol. 7, p. 42, 2008.
  66. S. Livesley, “Energy saving benefits of shade trees in relation to water use,” in Proc. TREENET Proceedings of the 11th National Street Tree Symposium, Adelaide, Sep.2010.
  67. M. E. Loughnan, N. Nicholls, and N. J. Tapper, “When the heat is on: Threshold temperatures for AMI admissions to hospital in Melbourne Australia,”Appl. Geogr., vol. 30,iss.1, pp. 63-69, 2010.
  68. P. Pakzad, P. Osmond, and C. H. Philipp, “Review of tools for quantifying the contribution of green infrastructure to carbon performance,” in Proc. ICUC9 - 9th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment, Toulouse, July 2015.
  69. J. Kent, S. Thompson, and B. Jalaludin, “Healthy Built Environments: A review of the literature,” Healthy Built Evironments Program, City Futures Research Centre, Univ. of New South Wales, Australia, 2011.
  70. Planet Ark, “Climbing Trees: Getting Aussie Kids Back Outdoors,” Planet Ark, Australia, 2011.
  71. Planet Ark, “Planting Trees: Just What The Doctor Ordered,” Planet Ark, Australia, 2012.
  72. R. Clark, Specifying Trees: a Guide to Assessment of Tree Quality, 2nd ed., Milsons Point, NSW, Australia: NATSPEC/Construction Information, 2003.
  73. P. Pakzad and P. Osmond, “Developing a sustainability indicator set for measuring green infrasttructure performance,” in Proc. Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development(UPADSD), pp. 63-74, Oct. 2015.
  74. A. W. Spirn, The Granite Garden: Urban Nature and Human Design, New York: Basic Books, 1984.
  75. M. Hough, Cities and Natural Processes: A Basis for Sustainability, London: Routledge, 2004.
  76. M. A. Benedict and E. T. McMahon. (2002). “Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for the 21st Century,” Available:
  77. Government Architect’s Office, “Technical Guidelines for Urban Green Cover in NSW,”Sydney, NSW: Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH), 2015.
  78. W. Edwards, T. Hinman, E. King, D. Mathews, L. Peckol, T. Reich, K. Rider, et al., “Benefits of Green, Transit-Oriented Development: Summary of Best Practices and Green Building Standards, Phase 2 Report,” Growing Transit Communities Partnership, East Corridor Implementation Support, Seattle, 2013.